Comparing CaseIH Puma 170 vs Mitsubishi GO321

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Puma 170 and the Mitsubishi GO321. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Puma 170
View tractor
Mitsubishi GO321
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer FPT Mitsubishi
Engine - Model Not provided S4L2
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration 24-valve -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 410.6 107.3
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 3.07
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) 167 (ECE R120 rated), 218 (ECE R120 max) 31.5
Transmission
Transmission - Type Full power shift / Continuously variable transmission (CVT) -
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 / Infinite (CVT) 16
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - 32
Dimensions
Length (in) - 123.6
Width (in) - 54.9 (ROPS), 56.1 (cab)
Height (in) - 78.5 (ROPS), 79.1 (cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 18740 3009 (ROPS), 3417 (cab)
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4 Wheel Drive (4WD) 4WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic Power Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Standard (ag)
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type 2/3N -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - ROPS/Cab
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) -