Comparing White Workhorse 195 vs Yanmar F-250

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the White Workhorse 195 and the Yanmar F-250. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

White Workhorse 195
View tractor
Yanmar F-250
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer CDC-Cummins Yanmar
Engine - Model - 3TNE82A
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 504.5 81.2
Engine - Bore (in) 4.49 3.23
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) - 24.7
Transmission
Transmission - Type Partial power shift Shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 2WD: 180 | 4WD: 173 105.9
Width (in) - 49.6
Height (in) - 77.4 (ROPS), 78.5 (cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 15545 1984 (ROPS), 2127 (cab)
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type - Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year - 1998
Hitch Type Three-Point Hitch JIS0
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - ROPS/Cab
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed center -