Comparing Shibaura 1300 vs Yanmar F-250

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Shibaura 1300 and the Yanmar F-250. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Shibaura 1300
View tractor
Yanmar F-250
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Shibaura Yanmar
Engine - Model LEK802D 3TNE82A
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 2 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 49.1 81.2
Engine - Bore (in) 3.15 3.23
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2700 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) 15.3 24.7
Transmission
Transmission - Type Gear shift Shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears 12 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 105.6 105.9
Width (in) 49.7 49.6
Height (in) 83.8 with ROPS 77.4 (ROPS), 78.5 (cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 1873 to 2139 1984 (ROPS), 2127 (cab)
Miscellaneous
Chassis 2WD/4WD Optional 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 2WD or MFWD 4WD Optional 4WD
Steering Type Manual Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) 4.2 -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag/Lawn/Turf Optional Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year 1982 1998
Hitch Type Three-Point Hitch Category I JIS0
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) 649 kg (1,432 lb.) -
Operator Station Type ROPS ROPS/Cab
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type Rear, transmission -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) 540 -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Differential mechanical drum -
Hydraulic System Type Live -