Comparing Hurlimann XA 606 vs Montana U4384C

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Hurlimann XA 606 and the Montana U4384C. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Hurlimann XA 606
View tractor
Montana U4384C
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer SAME Mitsubishi
Engine - Model - S4QS
Engine - Cooling Type - Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 183.1 141
Engine - Bore (in) 4.1338 -
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2350 2600
Engine - Power Output (hp) 60 41
Transmission
Transmission - Type Manual Synchro shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears 20 16
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 1485.04 135.2
Width (in) - 61.8
Height (in) 93.7 94 (with cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 5666 4828
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 2WD 4WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic power Hydraulic power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Ag
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type - Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type - -