Comparing LS XR50 vs McCormick Intl CT55U

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the LS XR50 and the McCormick Intl CT55U. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

LS XR50
View tractor
McCormick Intl CT55U
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer LS Mitsubishi
Engine - Model S4QL -
Engine - Cooling Type liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 4 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 152.9 153
Engine - Bore (in) 3.46 3.5
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2600 2600
Engine - Power Output (hp) 47 47
Transmission
Transmission - Type - -
Transmission - Forward Gears 16 16
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears 32 16
Dimensions
Length (in) 129.4 125
Width (in) 62.4 65.7
Height (in) 91.1 (with cab) 94.4
Operating Weight (lb) 4334 5005
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type hydrostatic power Hydrostatic power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Industrial
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type Category I -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - ROPS
Starter Type electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type - -