Comparing Challenger MT555E vs Ford 8770

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Challenger MT555E and the Ford 8770. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Challenger MT555E
View tractor
Ford 8770
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer AGCO Power Ford
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 402 456
Engine - Bore (in) 4.252 4.4
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2100 2100
Engine - Power Output (hp) 170.3 (Maximum Power at 2100 rpm) 190
Transmission
Transmission - Type Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) Full power shift, Creep
Transmission - Forward Gears Low range 0-19 mph (0-30 km/h), high range 0-25 mph (0-40 km/h) 32
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - 196.7
Width (in) - 96.7
Height (in) - 124.4
Operating Weight (lb) - 16600
Miscellaneous
Chassis - -
Drive Type - -
Steering Type - -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - 26.4
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year - 2002
Hitch Type III Three-point hitch
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - Maximum at drawbar (lbs) | 31500
Operator Station Type - Cab
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed-center load sensing, Direct engine drive Closed center load sensing