Comparing Ford 1900 vs Yanmar EF338

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Ford 1900 and the Yanmar EF338. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Ford 1900
View tractor
Yanmar EF338
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Shibaura Yanmar
Engine - Model LEM853 3TNV84T
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 87.2 91.3
Engine - Bore (in) 3.35 3.31
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2800 2700
Engine - Power Output (hp) 30 (Gross), 28.7 (PTO: 26.8) 37.4
Transmission
Transmission - Type Gear shift four-speed power shift
Transmission - Forward Gears 12 16
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - 32
Dimensions
Length (in) 118.9 125.2
Width (in) 57.7 59.3
Height (in) 86.3 with ROPS 76.2 (ROPS) | 77.6 (cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 2689 to 2922 3263 (ROPS) | 3616 (cab)
Miscellaneous
Chassis - 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 2WD or 4WD (optional) 4WD
Steering Type Manual (power optional) -
Coolant Capacity (qts) 7.2 -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 24 24
Rear Tire Width (in) - 13.6
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag Standard (ag)
Manufacture - End Year 1983 2004
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type ROPS ROPS | cab
Starter Type Electric starter electric
PTO Type Rear, transmission (Front optional) -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) 540 -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Differential mechanical drum (power type optional) -
Hydraulic System Type Open center -