Comparing Farmall 766 vs Fendt 209V

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Farmall 766 and the Fendt 209V. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Farmall 766
View tractor
Fendt 209V
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer International Harvester AGCO Power
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type - Liquid
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type - Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 360 201.4
Engine - Bore (in) 3.875 4.25
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2400 2100
Engine - Power Output (hp) - Unknown (Highest rated power being 93.9 hp according to EC 97/68 standard)
Transmission
Transmission - Type Partial power shift Continuously-variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission - Forward Gears 16 Infinite
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - 140.9 (209V variant)
Width (in) - 45.3 (209V variant)
Height (in) - 95 (209V variant, ROPS)
Operating Weight (lb) 10300 5688 (209V variant with ROPS)
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 2WD 4WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic power Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - Unknown (both ROPS and Cab versions exist)
Starter Type Electric Starter Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Open Center -