Comparing Challenger MT595E vs Montana U4384

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Challenger MT595E and the Montana U4384. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Challenger MT595E
View tractor
Montana U4384
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer AGCO Power Mitsubishi
Engine - Model - S4QS
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 449 141
Engine - Bore (in) 4.252 -
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2100 2600
Engine - Power Output (hp) 227 41
Transmission
Transmission - Type Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) with mechanical ranges Synchro shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears Infinite 16
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - 135.2
Width (in) - 61.8
Height (in) - 100.75 (with ROPS)
Operating Weight (lb) - 4266
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type Power Steering Hydraulic power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - Ag
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type Three-Point Hitch -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Cabin ROPS
Starter Type Electric Starter Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed-center load sensing -