Comparing CaseIH Puma 230 vs Mitsubishi D3250

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Puma 230 and the Mitsubishi D3250. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Puma 230
View tractor
Mitsubishi D3250
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer FPT Mitsubishi
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-Cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Turbocharged diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 411 -
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 -
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 -
Engine - Power Output (hp) 231 hp (ECE R120 Rated Power) 37
Transmission
Transmission - Type Continuously variable transmission (CVT) Gear
Transmission - Forward Gears - -
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - -
Width (in) - -
Height (in) - -
Operating Weight (lb) 19800 -
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic power -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type Rear Type: 2/3N -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type Electric Starter Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) -