Comparing CaseIH Puma 210 vs New Holland TL90A

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Puma 210 and the New Holland TL90A. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Puma 210
View tractor
New Holland TL90A
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer CNH CNH, NEF
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled (viscous fan) Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 411 273
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 4.094
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) 210 91
Transmission
Transmission - Type Full power shift Synchro Command, Mechanical Shuttle, Power Shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 24
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - 171.7
Width (in) - 79.2
Height (in) Cab: 119.7 / Exhaust: 122.6 96.6
Operating Weight (lb) 17915 8488 (2WD)
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD -
Drive Type 4WD 4x2 2WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic power Hydrostatic power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - 12.8
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) 16.9 -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 42 -
Rear Tire Width (in) 20.8 -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag Standard tires (ag)
Manufacture - End Year - 2007
Hitch Type Rear: II/IIIN Three-Point Hitch, Cat II
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - 5743.1 (lbs)
Operator Station Type Cab -
Starter Type Electric (12 volts) Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - Hydraulic wet disc
Hydraulic System Type Pressure flow compensating (PFC) Open center