Comparing CaseIH Puma 145 vs CaseIH Puma 160

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Puma 145 and the CaseIH Puma 160. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Puma 145
View tractor
CaseIH Puma 160
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer FPT FPT
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 410.6 410.6
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 4.094
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 146-188 160 - 203
Transmission
Transmission - Type Full power shift / Continuously variable transmission (CVT) Full power shift/Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 (alternative option is infinite with CVT) 18/19/Infinite (CVT)
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - -
Width (in) 61.4 to 88.8 61.4 to 88.8
Height (in) - -
Operating Weight (lb) 14350 16360
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type - -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type 2/3N -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Electro-hydraulic wet disc -
Hydraulic System Type Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)