Comparing CaseIH Puma 140 vs Fiat 500

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Puma 140 and the Fiat 500. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Puma 140
View tractor
Fiat 500
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer CNH Fiat
Engine - Model - 8035
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration 24-Valve -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 411 158.16
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 3.94
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2600
Engine - Power Output (hp) 140 50
Transmission
Transmission - Type Partial Power Shift -
Transmission - Forward Gears 18 8
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - 119 (2WD), 120.7 (4WD)
Width (in) - -
Height (in) 118.3 56.3 (Hood), 92.3 (Cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 13725 4023 to 4961
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD -
Drive Type - Optional 4WD and 2WD
Steering Type Hydrostatic Power Manual with Power as an Option
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 18.4 -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Radial Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type 2/3N Three-Point Hitch Categories II/I
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Cab -
Starter Type Electric Starter Electric Starter
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Hydraulic Wet Disc -
Hydraulic System Type Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) -