Comparing CaseIH Optum 300 vs Challenger MT635

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Optum 300 and the Challenger MT635. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Optum 300
View tractor
Challenger MT635
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer FPT Sisu
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 410.6 449
Engine - Bore (in) 4.095 4.251
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2100 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 300 hp -
Transmission
Transmission - Type Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) Power shift
Transmission - Forward Gears Infinite (4 range) forward and infinite (2 range) reverse 18
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 208.2 203
Width (in) 119 98.2
Height (in) 132.5 (cab) 121 (cab)
Operating Weight (lb) 23149 18975
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type Power Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) 16.54 -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 50 -
Rear Tire Width (in) 18.9 -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag Rear tires - Two 18.4R42; Front tires - Two 14.9R30
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type III Type III
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear Rear
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Cab Cab
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)