Comparing CaseIH MXU135 vs Shibaura SF1000T

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH MXU135 and the Shibaura SF1000T. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH MXU135
View tractor
Shibaura SF1000T
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer CNH Shibaura
Engine - Model - LER1104T
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-Cooled liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 4
Engine - Displacement (ci) 410.6 278.3
Engine - Bore (in) 4.094 4.331
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 2200
Engine - Power Output (hp) 135 105
Transmission
Transmission - Type Partial Power Shift constant mesh
Transmission - Forward Gears 24 16
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) - 157.9
Width (in) - 79.7
Height (in) - 72.4 (to steering wheel)
Operating Weight (lb) 10979-12020 7408
Miscellaneous
Chassis 2WD/4WD -
Drive Type 2WD / 4WD -
Steering Type Power Steering -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Agricultural ag
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type Three-Point Hitch -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Cab -
Starter Type Electric Starter electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Pressure-Flow Compensated (PFC) open center