Comparing CaseIH 265 vs Hurlimann H-1600 SX

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH 265 and the Hurlimann H-1600 SX. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH 265
View tractor
Hurlimann H-1600 SX
View tractor
Images
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Mitsubishi SAME
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled -
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 78.7 366.12
Engine - Bore (in) 3.07 4.1338
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2700 2350
Engine - Power Output (hp) 27 160
Transmission
Transmission - Type Constant Mesh -
Transmission - Forward Gears 9 18
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - 36
Dimensions
Length (in) 109.6 -
Width (in) - -
Height (in) 90.2 116.9
Operating Weight (lb) 2320 14,994
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x2 2WD
Drive Type 2WD 2WD
Steering Type Manual Hydrostatic power
Coolant Capacity (qts) 6.4 -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Agricultural and Lawn/Turf Ag
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type ROPS -
Starter Type Electric -
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Open -