ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Zetor 35 Super
ZetorModel B
Zetor 35 Super
Utility
- power
- 42 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
ZetorZetor 35 Super
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +243 hp (+579%)65C285 hp
35 Super42 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 35 Super is in the 20th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +384 ci (+151%)65C638 ci
35 Super254 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 35 Super is in the 35th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
35 Super4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 35 Super is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 65C higher · +5 (+100%)65C10
35 Super5
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 35 Super is in the 25th · 179 models
65C (A)35 Super (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Zetor | — |
| Model | 65C | 35 Super | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Zetor | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 42hp | ▲ 65C+243 hp · +579% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 65C+600 RPM · +40% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 254ci | ▲ 65C+384 ci · +151% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.1in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.7in | ▲ 65C+1.3 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 5,622lb | ▲ 65C+27,253 lb · +485% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Zetor 35 Super | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 20th percentile (42 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 35th percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 25th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 21st percentile (5,622 lb)
A · 65CB · 35 SuperMedian Crawler Tractor