Comparing Ford 1215 vs Yanmar YM1601

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Ford 1215 and the Yanmar YM1601. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Ford 1215
View tractor
Yanmar YM1601
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Shibaura Yanmar
Engine - Model S723 3T75U
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 54 60.7
Engine - Bore (in) 2.83 2.95
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2500 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) 16 16
Transmission
Transmission - Type Hydrostatic Gear
Transmission - Forward Gears Infinite 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 106.3 103
Width (in) 40.9 44
Height (in) 80.3 69
Operating Weight (lb) 1292 (2WD), 1360 (4WD) 1477 (2WD) / 1565 (4WD)
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD or 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x2 2WD
Drive Type 2WD or 4WD 2WD
Steering Type - -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - 4
Rear Tire Diameter (in) 16 22
Rear Tire Width (in) - 8.3
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag: Front: 4.00-12 (2WD), 5x12 (4WD). Rear: 8.00-16 Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year 1998 -
Hitch Type Three-Point Hitch -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Open -
Starter Type Electric Electric
PTO Type Rear PTO -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) 540 -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type Open Center -