Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs Yanmar FX32D
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FX32D
Utility
- power
- 32 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 5000
vs
YanmarYanmar FX32D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5000 higher · +37.1 hp (+116%)500069.1 hp
FX32D32 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; FX32D is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5000 higher · +133 ci (+133%)5000233 ci
FX32D100 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; FX32D is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied50004
FX32D4
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; FX32D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
5000 (A)FX32D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 5000 | FX32D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4TNA78 | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 32hp | ▲ 5000+37.1 hp · +116% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 233ci | 100ci | ▲ 5000+133 ci · +133% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.1in | ▲ 5000+1.1 in · +35% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 3.4in | ▲ 5000+0.8 in · +24% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 68.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Yanmar FX32D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 24th percentile (32 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 23rd percentile (100 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 5000B · FX32DMedian Utility Tractor