Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs Volvo 2650S
VolvoModel B
Volvo 2650S
Agricultural
- power
- 140 hp
- displacement
- 334 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 7
FordFord 5000
vs
VolvoVolvo 2650S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2650S higher · +70.9 hp (+103%)500069.1 hp
2650S140 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; 2650S is in the 92nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2650S higher · +101 ci (+43%)5000233 ci
2650S334 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; 2650S is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2650S higher · +2 (+50%)50004
2650S6
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; 2650S is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5000 higher · +1 (+14%)50008
2650S7
Median Utility Tractor12
5000 is in the 23rd percentile; 2650S is in the 15th · 4,941 models
5000 (A)2650S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Volvo | — |
| Model | 5000 | 2650S | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Volvo | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 140hp | ▲ 2650S+70.9 hp · +103% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 2650S+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 233ci | 334ci | ▲ 2650S+101 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 68.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 15,435lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Volvo 2650S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 92nd percentile (140 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 86th percentile (334 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 15th percentile (7)
A · 5000B · 2650SMedian Utility Tractor