Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755E
Utility
- power
- 326 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT755E vs Versatile 305
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B
Versatile 305
Utility
- power
- 256 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT755E
vs
VersatileVersatile 305
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT755E higher · +70 hp (+27%)MT755E326 hp
305256 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT755E is in the 97th percentile; 305 is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT755E higher · +94 ci (+19%)MT755E599 ci
305505 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT755E is in the 95th percentile; 305 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT755E higher · +1 (+17%)MT755E7
3056
Median Utility Tractor4
MT755E is in the 98th percentile; 305 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT755E16
30516
Median Utility Tractor12
MT755E is in the 73rd percentile; 305 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT755E (A)305 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Versatile | — |
| Model | MT755E | 305 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | QSC8.3 | — |
| Power Output | 326hp | 256hp | ▲ MT755E+70 hp · +27% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 305+300 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT755E+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | 505ci | ▲ MT755E+94 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 305+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT755E+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | Partially synchronized / Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 265in | — |
| Width | 34in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 146in | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,235lb | 30,890lb | ▲ MT755E+2,345 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC) | Direct engine drive | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category IVN/III | III | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 17,263lb | 15,791lb | ▲ MT755E+1,472 lb · +9% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Versatile 305 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (326 hp)B · 96th percentile (256 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 95th percentile (599 ci)B · 94th percentile (505 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 98th percentile (7)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 98th percentile (33,235 lb)B · 97th percentile (30,890 lb)
A · MT755EB · 305Median Utility Tractor