ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Ursus 6824 Mido
Image not recorded
UrsusModel B
Ursus 6824 Mido
Agricultural
- power
- 91.2 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
UrsusUrsus 6824 Mido
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +194 hp (+213%)65C285 hp
6824 Mido91.2 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 45th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +370 ci (+138%)65C638 ci
6824 Mido268 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 36th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
6824 Mido4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6824 Mido higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
6824 Mido12
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 6824 Mido is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)6824 Mido (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ursus | — |
| Model | 65C | 6824 Mido | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 91.2hp | ▲ 65C+194 hp · +213% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 268ci | ▲ 65C+370 ci · +138% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.7in | ▲ 65C+1.3 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 154in | ▲ 65C+78 in · +51% |
| Width | 120in | 86.6in | ▲ 65C+33.4 in · +39% |
| Height | 128in | 106in | ▲ 65C+22 in · +21% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 8,609lb | ▲ 65C+24,266 lb · +282% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Ursus 6824 Mido | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 45th percentile (91.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 36th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 29th percentile (8,609 lb)
A · 65CB · 6824 MidoMedian Crawler Tractor