ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Steyr 8130
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 8130
Agricultural
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 316 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 48
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
SteyrSteyr 8130
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +165 hp (+138%)65C285 hp
8130120 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 8130 is in the 47th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +322 ci (+102%)65C638 ci
8130316 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 8130 is in the 42nd · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
81306
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 8130 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8130 higher · +38 (+380%)65C10
813048
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 8130 is in the 99th · 179 models
65C (A)8130 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Steyr | — |
| Model | 65C | 8130 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Steyr | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | WD 611.88 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 120hp | ▲ 65C+165 hp · +138% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 8130+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 316ci | ▲ 65C+322 ci · +102% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+1.7 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Synchronized/Shuttle/Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 169in | ▲ 65C+63 in · +37% |
| Width | 120in | 84.3in | ▲ 65C+35.7 in · +42% |
| Height | 128in | 104in | ▲ 65C+24 in · +23% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 9,943lb | ▲ 65C+22,932 lb · +231% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Steyr 8130 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 47th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 42nd percentile (316 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 99th percentile (48)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 32nd percentile (9,943 lb)
A · 65CB · 8130Median Crawler Tractor