Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs Steiger Panther 1000
Image not recorded
SteigerModel B
Steiger Panther 1000
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 5000
vs
SteigerSteiger Panther 1000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Panther 1000 higher · +266 hp (+385%)500069.1 hp
Panther 1000335 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; Panther 1000 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Panther 1000 higher · +622 ci (+267%)5000233 ci
Panther 1000855 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; Panther 1000 is in the 98th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Panther 1000 higher · +2 (+50%)50004
Panther 10006
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; Panther 1000 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Panther 1000 higher · +4 (+50%)50008
Panther 100012
Median Utility Tractor12
5000 is in the 23rd percentile; Panther 1000 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
5000 (A)Panther 1000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Steiger | — |
| Model | 5000 | Panther 1000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Cummins 14.0L 6-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 335hp | ▲ Panther 1000+266 hp · +385% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ Panther 1000+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 233ci | 855ci | ▲ Panther 1000+622 ci · +267% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 5.5in | ▲ Panther 1000+1.3 in · +31% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 6in | ▲ Panther 1000+1.8 in · +43% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 281in | — |
| Width | 68.1in | 44in | ▲ 5000+24.1 in · +55% |
| Height | 63.4in | 150in | ▲ Panther 1000+86.6 in · +137% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 29,000lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Articulated power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Articulated power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Steiger Panther 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 97th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 98th percentile (855 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Width
median 66 inA · 55th percentile (68.1 in)B · 8th percentile (44 in)
A · 5000B · Panther 1000Median Utility Tractor