ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Schluter Super 1050
SchluterModel B
Schluter Super 1050
Utility
- power
- 100 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
SchluterSchluter Super 1050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +185 hp (+185%)65C285 hp
Super 1050100 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; Super 1050 is in the 45th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +219 ci (+52%)65C638 ci
Super 1050419 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; Super 1050 is in the 47th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
Super 10506
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; Super 1050 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ Super 1050 higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
Super 105012
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; Super 1050 is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)Super 1050 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Schluter | — |
| Model | 65C | Super 1050 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Schluter | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | SDM 108 W 6 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 100hp | ▲ 65C+185 hp · +185% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 65C+300 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 419ci | ▲ 65C+219 ci · +52% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+0.5 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.9in | ▲ 65C+1.1 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 181in | ▲ 65C+51 in · +28% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 98.8in | ▲ 65C+29.2 in · +30% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 10,109lb | ▲ 65C+22,766 lb · +225% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Schluter Super 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 45th percentile (100 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 47th percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 32nd percentile (10,109 lb)
A · 65CB · Super 1050Median Crawler Tractor