SAMEModel A
SAME Tiger Six 105
Row Crop
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 331 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
SAME Tiger Six 105 vs Yanmar YM270
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM270
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 55.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
SAMESAME Tiger Six 105
vs
YanmarYanmar YM270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +85 hp (+425%)Tiger Six 105105 hp
YM27020 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Tiger Six 105 is in the 28th percentile; YM270 is in the 1st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +276 ci (+497%)Tiger Six 105331 ci
YM27055.4 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Tiger Six 105 is in the 36th percentile; YM270 is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +4 (+200%)Tiger Six 1056
YM2702
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Tiger Six 105 is in the 50th percentile; YM270 is in the 1st · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Tiger Six 105 higher · +6 (+100%)Tiger Six 10512
YM2706
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Tiger Six 105 is in the 27th percentile; YM270 is in the 11th · 1,200 models
Tiger Six 105 (A)YM270 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Tiger Six 105 | YM270 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 986P | 2W85 | — |
| Power Output | 105hp | 20hp | ▲ Tiger Six 105+85 hp · +425% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 2 | ▲ Tiger Six 105+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 331ci | 55.4ci | ▲ Tiger Six 105+276 ci · +497% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Syncromesh | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 87.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,333lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | SAME Tiger Six 105 | Yanmar YM270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 28th percentile (105 hp)B · 1st percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 36th percentile (331 ci)B · 1st percentile (55.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 11th percentile (6)
A · Tiger Six 105B · YM270Median Row Crop Tractor