RomeModel A
Rome 600C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,150 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Rome 600C vs Schluter Compact 750
SchluterModel B
Schluter Compact 750
Utility
- power
- 68 hp
- displacement
- 218 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
RomeRome 600C
vs
SchluterSchluter Compact 750
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 600C higher · +532 hp (+782%)600C600 hp
Compact 75068 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
600C is in the 92nd percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 600C higher · +932 ci (+428%)600C1,150 ci
Compact 750218 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
600C is in the 96th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 600C higher · +3 (+100%)600C6
Compact 7503
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
600C is in the 50th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 1st · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied600C12
Compact 75012
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
600C is in the 27th percentile; Compact 750 is in the 27th · 146 models
600C (A)Compact 750 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Rome | Schluter | — |
| Model | 600C | Compact 750 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Schluter | — |
| Model | KTA-1150C | SDM 110 W 3 | — |
| Power Output | 600hp | 68hp | ▲ 600C+532 hp · +782% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 600C+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,150ci | 218ci | ▲ 600C+932 ci · +428% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Powershift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 155in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 96.9in | — |
| Operating Weight | 42,600lb | 7,342lb | ▲ 600C+35,258 lb · +480% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Rome 600C | Schluter Compact 750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 Articulated | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Mechanical/Power Assist | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 92nd percentile (600 hp)B · 1st percentile (68 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 96th percentile (1,150 ci)B · 1st percentile (218 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 64th percentile (42,600 lb)B · 1st percentile (7,342 lb)
A · 600CB · Compact 750Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor