Comparing CaseIH Steiger 400 Rowtrac vs Rhino 162

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the CaseIH Steiger 400 Rowtrac and the Rhino 162. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

CaseIH Steiger 400 Rowtrac
View tractor
Rhino 162
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer FPT -
Engine - Model - -
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled with viscous fan -
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration 24-valve -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 6 -
Engine - Displacement (ci) 787 -
Engine - Bore (in) 5.315 -
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2100 -
Engine - Power Output (hp) 400 16
Transmission
Transmission - Type Full power shift -
Transmission - Forward Gears 16 -
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 315 -
Width (in) Varies (Min: 96, Max: 144) -
Height (in) 151.3 (Cab height) -
Operating Weight (lb) 55785 -
Miscellaneous
Chassis - 4x2 2WD
Drive Type - 2WD
Steering Type - -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type - -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type IVNl IIIN (optional) -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position Rear -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type Cab -
Starter Type Electric -
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type Electro-hydraulic wet disc -
Hydraulic System Type Pressure flow compensated -