ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Mitsubishi MT33
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT33
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 90.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT33
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +252 hp (+764%)65C285 hp
MT3333 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; MT33 is in the 16th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +547 ci (+602%)65C638 ci
MT3390.9 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; MT33 is in the 4th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
MT334
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; MT33 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT33 higher · +6 (+60%)65C10
MT3316
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; MT33 is in the 69th · 179 models
65C (A)MT33 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 65C | MT33 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | K4F | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 33hp | ▲ 65C+252 hp · +764% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 90.9ci | ▲ 65C+547 ci · +602% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.1in | ▲ 65C+1.7 in · +55% |
| Stroke | 6in | 3.1in | ▲ 65C+2.9 in · +94% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Mitsubishi MT33 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 16th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 4th percentile (90.9 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)
A · 65CB · MT33Median Crawler Tractor