Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel A
Mitsubishi MT26
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 90.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Mitsubishi MT26 vs Yanmar LX490
YanmarModel B
Yanmar LX490
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48.5 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT26
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LX490 higher · +22.5 hp (+87%)MT2626 hp
LX49048.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT26 is in the 18th percentile; LX490 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ LX490 higher · +31.1 ci (+34%)MT2690.9 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT26 is in the 16th percentile; LX490 is in the 29th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT264
LX4904
Median Utility Tractor4
MT26 is in the 50th percentile; LX490 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
MT26 (A)LX490 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Yanmar | — |
| Model | MT26 | LX490 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Not recorded | — |
| Model | K4F | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 26hp | 48.5hp | ▲ LX490+22.5 hp · +87% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 90.9ci | 122ci | ▲ LX490+31.1 ci · +34% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 83.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 3,618lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,760lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Mitsubishi MT26 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 18th percentile (26 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 16th percentile (90.9 ci)B · 29th percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · MT26B · LX490Median Utility Tractor