Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel A
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Massey Ferguson 210 vs Mitsubishi MT26
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT26
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 90.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT26
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT26 higher · +1 hp (+4%)21025 hp
MT2626 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
210 is in the 16th percentile; MT26 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT26 higher · +13.8 ci (+18%)21077.1 ci
MT2690.9 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
210 is in the 11th percentile; MT26 is in the 16th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT26 higher · +2 (+100%)2102
MT264
Median Utility Tractor4
210 is in the 3rd percentile; MT26 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT26 higher · +4 (+33%)21012
MT2616
Median Utility Tractor12
210 is in the 50th percentile; MT26 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
210 (A)MT26 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Massey Ferguson | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 210 | MT26 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Toyosha | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | P126 | K4F | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ MT26+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ MT26+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 77.1ci | 90.9ci | ▲ MT26+13.8 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 2,325lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375) | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Massey Ferguson 210 | Mitsubishi MT26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)B · 16th percentile (90.9 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · 210B · MT26Median Utility Tractor