Comparing Mitsubishi MT201 vs Rome 600C

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Mitsubishi MT201 and the Rome 600C. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Mitsubishi MT201
View tractor
Rome 600C
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Mitsubishi Cummins
Engine - Model S3L2 KTA-1150C
Engine - Cooling Type Liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 3 6
Engine - Displacement (ci) 80.4 1150
Engine - Bore (in) 3.071 -
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2500 2100
Engine - Power Output (hp) 19.7 600
Transmission
Transmission - Type - Powershift
Transmission - Forward Gears 8 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 106.3 -
Width (in) 45.5 -
Height (in) 75.8 -
Operating Weight (lb) 1973 42,600
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x4 MFWD 4WD 4x4 Articulated
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Steering Type Power -
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Standard (ag) -
Manufacture - End Year - -
Hitch Type - -
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type Electric -
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type - -