Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Mitsubishi GO320
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GO320
Utility
- power
- 31.5 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GO320
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +52.5 hp (+167%)Farmall 9084 hp
GO32031.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; GO320 is in the 24th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +167 ci (+156%)Farmall 90274 ci
GO320107 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; GO320 is in the 25th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 904
GO3204
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; GO320 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GO320 higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9012
GO32016
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; GO320 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)GO320 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | GO320 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | FPT | S4L2 | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 31.5hp | ▲ Farmall 90+52.5 hp · +167% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ GO320+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 107ci | ▲ Farmall 90+167 ci · +156% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.1in | ▲ Farmall 90+1 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.6in | ▲ Farmall 90+1.6 in · +44% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Height | 101in | 78.5in | ▲ Farmall 90+22.5 in · +29% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 3,009lb | ▲ Farmall 90+2,693 lb · +89% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | JISI | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Mitsubishi GO320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 24th percentile (31.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 25th percentile (107 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,009 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · GO320Median Utility Tractor