ChamberlainModel A
Chamberlain Canelander
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 270 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Chamberlain Canelander vs Mitsubishi GF150
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GF150
Utility
- power
- 14.8 hp
- displacement
- 58.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
ChamberlainChamberlain Canelander
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GF150
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Canelander higher · +47.2 hp (+319%)Canelander62 hp
GF15014.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Canelander is in the 56th percentile; GF150 is in the 2nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Canelander higher · +212 ci (+365%)Canelander270 ci
GF15058.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Canelander is in the 78th percentile; GF150 is in the 5th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Canelander higher · +1 (+33%)Canelander4
GF1503
Median Utility Tractor4
Canelander is in the 50th percentile; GF150 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedCanelander9
GF1509
Median Utility Tractor12
Canelander is in the 35th percentile; GF150 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Canelander (A)GF150 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Chamberlain | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Canelander | GF150 | — |
| Category | Utility, High-Clearance | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 4-270D | L3E | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 14.8hp | ▲ Canelander+47.2 hp · +319% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ Canelander+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 270ci | 58.1ci | ▲ Canelander+212 ci · +365% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3in | ▲ Canelander+1.3 in · +43% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 2.8in | ▲ Canelander+2 in · +71% |
Transmission
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | 84.5in | ▲ Canelander+64.5 in · +76% |
| Width | 79in | 37.4in | ▲ Canelander+41.6 in · +111% |
| Height | 75.5in | 69.7in | ▲ Canelander+5.8 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 7,350lb | 1,367lb | ▲ Canelander+5,983 lb · +438% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Mitsubishi GF150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62 hp)B · 2nd percentile (14.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (270 ci)B · 5th percentile (58.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 70th percentile (7,350 lb)B · 4th percentile (1,367 lb)
A · CanelanderB · GF150Median Utility Tractor