ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs McCormick Intl MTX140
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl MTX140
Row Crop
- power
- 145 hp
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MTX140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +140 hp (+97%)65C285 hp
MTX140145 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; MTX140 is in the 49th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +273 ci (+75%)65C638 ci
MTX140365 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; MTX140 is in the 44th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
MTX1406
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; MTX140 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ MTX140 higher · +22 (+220%)65C10
MTX14032
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; MTX140 is in the 99th · 179 models
65C (A)MTX140 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 65C | MTX140 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 1006-60T | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 145hp | ▲ 65C+140 hp · +97% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MTX140+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 365ci | ▲ 65C+273 ci · +75% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Four-speed power shift with creeper option | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 203in | ▲ 65C+29 in · +14% |
| Width | 120in | 90.6in | ▲ 65C+29.4 in · +32% |
| Height | 128in | 115in | ▲ 65C+13 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 12,130lb | ▲ 65C+20,745 lb · +171% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | McCormick Intl MTX140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 49th percentile (145 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 44th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 99th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 40th percentile (12,130 lb)
A · 65CB · MTX140Median Crawler Tractor