Head to head · Sub-Compact

Cub Cadet 7000 vs McCormick Intl MTX125

Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A

Cub Cadet 7000

Sub-Compact

power
20 hp
displacement
68.6 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
6
Full 7000 specs
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B

McCormick Intl MTX125

Row Crop

power
130 hp
displacement
365 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MTX125 specs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7000
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MTX125

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 584–816

Engine Power

▲ MTX125 higher · +110 hp (+550%)
700020 hp
MTX125130 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

7000 is in the 25th percentile; MTX125 is in the 99th · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MTX125 higher · +296 ci (+432%)
700068.6 ci
MTX125365 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

7000 is in the 31st percentile; MTX125 is in the 99th · 757 models

Cylinders

▲ MTX125 higher · +3 (+100%)
70003
MTX1256
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

7000 is in the 50th percentile; MTX125 is in the 99th · 802 models

Forward Gears

▲ MTX125 higher · +10 (+167%)
70006
MTX12516
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9

7000 is in the 18th percentile; MTX125 is in the 89th · 616 models

7000 (A)MTX125 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
ManufacturerCub CadetMcCormick Intl—
Model7000MTX125—
CategorySub-CompactRow Crop—

Engine

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiPerkins—
ModelNot recorded1006-60T—
Power Output20hp130hp▲ MTX125+110 hp · +550%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,200RPM▲ 7000+300 RPM · +14%
Cylinders36▲ MTX125+3 · +100%
Displacement68.6ci365ci▲ MTX125+296 ci · +432%
Bore3.1in3.9in▲ MTX125+0.8 in · +26%
Stroke3.1in5in▲ MTX125+1.9 in · +61%

Transmission

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
TypePartially synchronizedFour-speed power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
Length107in203in▲ MTX125+96 in · +90%
Width46.3in90.6in▲ MTX125+44.3 in · +96%
Height78.9in113in▲ MTX125+34.1 in · +43%
Operating Weight1,837lb12,020lb▲ MTX125+10,183 lb · +554%

Hydraulics

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
System TypeOpen centerPressure flow compensating—
Steering TypePower steeringHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryIIII—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypePower steeringHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
Coolant1.5galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCub Cadet 7000McCormick Intl MTX125Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 25th percentile (20 hp)B · 99th percentile (130 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 31st percentile (68.6 ci)B · 99th percentile (365 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 50th percentile (3)B · 99th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 9
A · 18th percentile (6)B · 89th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 33rd percentile (1,837 lb)B · 99th percentile (12,020 lb)
A · 7000B · MTX125Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageCub Cadet 7000Full spec pageMcCormick Intl MTX125