Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs McCormick Intl MTX125
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl MTX125
Row Crop
- power
- 130 hp
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MTX125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MTX125 higher · +46 hp (+55%)Farmall 9084 hp
MTX125130 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; MTX125 is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MTX125 higher · +91 ci (+33%)Farmall 90274 ci
MTX125365 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; MTX125 is in the 88th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MTX125 higher · +2 (+50%)Farmall 904
MTX1256
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; MTX125 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MTX125 higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9012
MTX12516
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; MTX125 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)MTX125 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | MTX125 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Perkins | — |
| Model | FPT | 1006-60T | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 130hp | ▲ MTX125+46 hp · +55% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 90+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MTX125+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 365ci | ▲ MTX125+91 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 203in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Height | 101in | 113in | ▲ MTX125+12 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 12,020lb | ▲ MTX125+6,318 lb · +111% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Pressure flow compensating | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | McCormick Intl MTX125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 91st percentile (130 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 88th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 90th percentile (12,020 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · MTX125Median Utility Tractor