Image not recorded
LSModel A
LS XJ25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
LS XJ25 vs McCormick Intl CX105
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX105
Utility
- power
- 102 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
LSLS XJ25
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX105
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX105 higher · +77.6 hp (+318%)XJ2524.4 hp
CX105102 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
XJ25 is in the 15th percentile; CX105 is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CX105 higher · +189 ci (+235%)XJ2580.4 ci
CX105269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
XJ25 is in the 12th percentile; CX105 is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CX105 higher · +1 (+33%)XJ253
CX1054
Median Utility Tractor4
XJ25 is in the 23rd percentile; CX105 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CX105 higher · +6,450 lb (+352%)XJ251,830 lb
CX1058,280 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
XJ25 is in the 10th percentile; CX105 is in the 77th · 5,107 models
XJ25 (A)CX105 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | LS | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | XJ25 | CX105 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Perkins | — |
| Model | S3L2 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.4hp | 102hp | ▲ CX105+77.6 hp · +318% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ XJ25+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ CX105+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 80.4ci | 269ci | ▲ CX105+189 ci · +235% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 4.1in | ▲ CX105+1 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 5in | ▲ CX105+1.4 in · +39% |
Transmission
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 103in | 166in | ▲ CX105+63 in · +61% |
| Width | 44.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 85in | 108in | ▲ CX105+23 in · +27% |
| Operating Weight | 1,830lb | 8,280lb | ▲ CX105+6,450 lb · +352% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | LS XJ25 | McCormick Intl CX105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.4 hp)B · 84th percentile (102 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 10th percentile (1,830 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,280 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 11th percentile (103 in)B · 84th percentile (166 in)
A · XJ25B · CX105Median Utility Tractor