ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs LS MT125
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS MT125
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
LSLS MT125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +260 hp (+1054%)65C285 hp
MT12524.7 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; MT125 is in the 8th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +561 ci (+726%)65C638 ci
MT12577.2 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; MT125 is in the 3rd · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +3 (+100%)65C6
MT1253
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; MT125 is in the 10th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65C higher · +31,431 lb (+2177%)65C32,875 lb
MT1251,444 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
65C is in the 68th percentile; MT125 is in the 1st · 173 models
65C (A)MT125 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | LS | — |
| Model | 65C | MT125 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 3TNV80F | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 24.7hp | ▲ 65C+260 hp · +1054% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ MT125+900 RPM · +43% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ 65C+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 77.2ci | ▲ 65C+561 ci · +726% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.2in | ▲ 65C+1.7 in · +55% |
| Stroke | 6in | 3.3in | ▲ 65C+2.7 in · +82% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 97in | ▲ 65C+135 in · +139% |
| Width | 120in | 47in | ▲ 65C+73 in · +155% |
| Height | 128in | 87in | ▲ 65C+41 in · +47% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 1,444lb | ▲ 65C+31,431 lb · +2177% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 8th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 3rd percentile (77.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 10th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,444 lb)
Length
median 146 inA · 83rd percentile (232 in)B · 3rd percentile (97 in)
A · 65CB · MT125Median Crawler Tractor