ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Leyland 262
LeylandModel B
Leyland 262
Standard Tread
- power
- 60.7 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
LeylandLeyland 262
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +224 hp (+370%)65C285 hp
26260.7 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 262 is in the 38th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +408 ci (+177%)65C638 ci
262230 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 262 is in the 32nd · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
2624
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 262 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied65C10
26210
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 262 is in the 50th · 179 models
65C (A)262 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Leyland | — |
| Model | 65C | 262 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Leyland | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 4/98DT | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 60.7hp | ▲ 65C+224 hp · +370% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 262+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 230ci | ▲ 65C+408 ci · +177% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.9in | ▲ 65C+1.1 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Syncro Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 133in | ▲ 65C+99 in · +74% |
| Width | 120in | 64in | ▲ 65C+56 in · +88% |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 5,400lb | ▲ 65C+27,475 lb · +509% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual/Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual/Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Leyland 262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 38th percentile (60.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 32nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 18th percentile (5,400 lb)
A · 65CB · 262Median Crawler Tractor