ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Landini 8530F
LandiniModel B
Landini 8530F
Agricultural
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
LandiniLandini 8530F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +205 hp (+256%)65C285 hp
8530F80 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 8530F is in the 43rd · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +390 ci (+157%)65C638 ci
8530F248 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 8530F is in the 35th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
8530F4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 8530F is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8530F higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
8530F12
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 8530F is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)8530F (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Landini | — |
| Model | 65C | 8530F | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 4.248 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 80hp | ▲ 65C+205 hp · +256% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 248ci | ▲ 65C+390 ci · +157% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4in | ▲ 65C+0.8 in · +20% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5in | ▲ 65C+1 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Syncromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Landini 8530F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 43rd percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 35th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
A · 65CB · 8530FMedian Crawler Tractor