ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs John Deere 4052M
John DeereModel B
John Deere 4052M
Utility
- power
- 51.5 hp
- displacement
- 128 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4052M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +234 hp (+453%)65C285 hp
4052M51.5 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 4052M is in the 31st · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +510 ci (+398%)65C638 ci
4052M128 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 4052M is in the 13th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
4052M4
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 4052M is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4052M higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
4052M12
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 4052M is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)4052M (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 65C | 4052M | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | 4TNV86 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 51.5hp | ▲ 65C+234 hp · +453% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 4052M+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 128ci | ▲ 65C+510 ci · +398% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 3.4in | ▲ 65C+1.4 in · +41% |
| Stroke | 6in | 3.5in | ▲ 65C+2.5 in · +71% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Power shuttle / Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 130in | ▲ 65C+102 in · +78% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 100in | ▲ 65C+28 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 3,770lb | ▲ 65C+29,105 lb · +772% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,130lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 4052M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 31st percentile (51.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 13th percentile (128 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 11th percentile (3,770 lb)
A · 65CB · 4052MMedian Crawler Tractor