Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs John Deere 4025
John DeereModel B
John Deere 4025
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4025
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 4025 higher · +130 ci (+47%)Farmall 90274 ci
4025404 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; 4025 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 4025 higher · +2 (+50%)Farmall 904
40256
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; 4025 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +4 (+50%)Farmall 9012
40258
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; 4025 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 4025 higher · +2,853 lb (+50%)Farmall 905,702 lb
40258,555 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall 90 is in the 54th percentile; 4025 is in the 79th · 5,107 models
Farmall 90 (A)4025 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | 4025 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | John Deere | — |
| Model | FPT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 4025+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 4025+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 404ci | ▲ 4025+130 ci · +47% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 4025+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.8in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Partially synchronized and full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 153in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 89.6in | — |
| Height | 101in | 90.8in | ▲ Farmall 90+10.2 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 8,555lb | ▲ 4025+2,853 lb · +50% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 90th percentile (404 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 79th percentile (8,555 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 68th percentile (101 in)B · 42nd percentile (90.8 in)
A · Farmall 90B · 4025Median Utility Tractor