ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs John Deere 2750
John DeereModel B
John Deere 2750
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 2750
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +210 hp (+280%)65C285 hp
275075 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 2750 is in the 40th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +399 ci (+167%)65C638 ci
2750239 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 2750 is in the 34th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)65C6
27504
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 2750 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Height
▲ 65C higher · +26 in (+25%)65C128 in
2750102 in
Median Crawler Tractor90.6 in
65C is in the 78th percentile; 2750 is in the 60th · 134 models
65C (A)2750 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 65C | 2750 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 75hp | ▲ 65C+210 hp · +280% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 2750+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 638ci | 239ci | ▲ 65C+399 ci · +167% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.2in | ▲ 65C+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 6in | 4.3in | ▲ 65C+1.7 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partially synchronized, Partial powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 102in | ▲ 65C+26 in · +25% |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,295lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 0.9gal | ▲ 65C+10.2 gal · +1275% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | John Deere 2750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS or Sound-Gard cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 40th percentile (75 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 34th percentile (239 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Height
median 90.6 inA · 78th percentile (128 in)B · 60th percentile (102 in)
A · 65CB · 2750Median Crawler Tractor