Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Jinma JM-754
Image not recorded
JinmaModel B
Jinma JM-754
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
JinmaJinma JM-754
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +9 hp (+12%)Farmall 9084 hp
JM-75475 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; JM-754 is in the 68th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 904
JM-7544
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; JM-754 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +4 (+50%)Farmall 9012
JM-7548
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; JM-754 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)JM-754 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Jinma | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | JM-754 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Jinma | — |
| Model | FPT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 75hp | ▲ Farmall 90+9 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 90+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Jinma JM-754 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 68th percentile (75 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
A · Farmall 90B · JM-754Median Utility Tractor