ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs IMT 5170
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
IMTIMT 5170
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +112 hp (+65%)65C285 hp
5170173 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 5170 is in the 49th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +55 ci (+9%)65C638 ci
5170583 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 5170 is in the 65th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
51706
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 5170 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5170 higher · +6 (+60%)65C10
517016
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 5170 is in the 69th · 179 models
65C (A)5170 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | IMT | — |
| Model | 65C | 5170 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Mercedes-Benz | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | OM 401 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 173hp | ▲ 65C+112 hp · +65% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 5170+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 583ci | ▲ 65C+55 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 4.9in | ▲ 5170+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.1in | ▲ 65C+0.9 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 18,015lb | ▲ 65C+14,860 lb · +82% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | IMT 5170 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 49th percentile (173 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 65th percentile (583 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 69th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 45th percentile (18,015 lb)
A · 65CB · 5170Median Crawler Tractor