Head to head · Utility
IMT 2090 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
IMTIMT 2090
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2090 higher · +66 hp (+264%)209091 hp
21025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2090 is in the 79th percentile; 210 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2090 higher · +199 ci (+258%)2090276 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2090 is in the 82nd percentile; 210 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 2090 higher · +2 (+100%)20904
2102
Median Utility Tractor4
2090 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 210 higher · +2 (+20%)209010
21012
Median Utility Tractor12
2090 is in the 39th percentile; 210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
2090 (A)210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | IMT | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 2090 | 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Toyosha | — |
| Model | 4045TF270 | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 91hp | 25hp | ▲ 2090+66 hp · +264% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 210+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 | ▲ 2090+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 276ci | 77.1ci | ▲ 2090+199 ci · +258% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.6in | ▲ 2090+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5in | 3.7in | ▲ 2090+1.3 in · +35% |
Transmission
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,261lb | 2,325lb | ▲ 2090+6,936 lb · +298% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | IMT 2090 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.3gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (91 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 82nd percentile (276 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 83rd percentile (9,261 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)
A · 2090B · 210Median Utility Tractor