Comparing Hurlimann Prince 35 vs Yanmar F-190

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Hurlimann Prince 35 and the Yanmar F-190. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Hurlimann Prince 35
View tractor
Yanmar F-190
View tractor
Images No images available No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Mitsubishi Yanmar
Engine - Model - 3TNE78A
Engine - Cooling Type liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type diesel Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 4 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 91.5 73.5
Engine - Bore (in) 3.07 3.07
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 3000 2500
Engine - Power Output (hp) 39 18.7
Transmission
Transmission - Type partially synchronized Shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears - 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears 16 12
Dimensions
Length (in) 116.1 105.9
Width (in) 48 45.3
Height (in) 77 76
Operating Weight (lb) 2756 2039
Miscellaneous
Chassis 4x2 2WD 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type 2WD 4WD
Steering Type hydrostatic power Power
Coolant Capacity (qts) - -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) 20 -
Tire Type - Standard (ag)
Manufacture - End Year - 1998
Hitch Type - JIS0
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - ROPS/Cab
Starter Type electric Electric
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type - -