Comparing Ford 820 vs Hurlimann Prince 325

This page provides a detailed comparison of the specifications for the Ford 820 and the Hurlimann Prince 325. The specifications are categorized into four main sections: Engine, Transmission, Dimensions, and Miscellaneous. By comparing these two tractors side by side, you can easily identify the similarities and differences between them and determine which one best suits your needs.

Ford 820
View tractor
Hurlimann Prince 325
View tractor
Images No images available
Engine
Engine - Manufacturer Ford Mitsubishi
Engine - Model - K3F-D
Engine - Cooling Type - Liquid-cooled
Engine - Cylinder Orientation - -
Engine - Valve Configuration - -
Engine - Fuel Type Gasoline, LP Gas Diesel
Engine - Induction Type - -
Engine - Cylinders 4 3
Engine - Displacement (ci) 172 68.2
Engine - Bore (in) 3.9 3.071
Engine - Stroke (in) - -
Engine - Rated RPM 2200 3000
Engine - Power Output (hp) 44 25
Transmission
Transmission - Type Unsynchronized Gear Synchronized shuttle
Transmission - Forward Gears 5 12
Transmission - Reverse Gears - -
Transmission - Total Gears - -
Dimensions
Length (in) 113.6 105.91
Width (in) 64.75 44.13 (minimum)
Height (in) 55.5 78.8 (assumed at cab height)
Operating Weight (lb) 3400 2,215
Miscellaneous
Chassis - 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Drive Type - 4WD
Steering Type Manual Hydrostatic power
Coolant Capacity (qts) 15 -
Front Tire Diameter (in) - -
Front Tire Width (in) - -
Rear Tire Diameter (in) - -
Rear Tire Width (in) - -
Front/Rear Rim Diameter (in) - -
Tire Type Ag Front: 6.00-16, Ag Rear: Unknown Agricultural
Manufacture - End Year 1957 -
Hitch Type - Category 1
Hitch Category - -
Hitch Position - -
Hitch Capacity (lb) - -
Operator Station Type - -
Starter Type - 12 volts
PTO Type - -
PTO Speed 1 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 2 (rpm) - -
PTO Speed 3 (rpm) - -
Brake Type - -
Hydraulic System Type - -