Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford TW-25 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord TW-25
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ TW-25 higher · +131 hp (+524%)TW-25156 hp
21025 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
TW-25 is in the 60th percentile; 210 is in the 2nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TW-25 higher · +324 ci (+420%)TW-25401 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
TW-25 is in the 51st percentile; 210 is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ TW-25 higher · +4 (+200%)TW-256
2102
Median Row Crop Tractor6
TW-25 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 1st · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ TW-25 higher · +4 (+33%)TW-2516
21012
Median Row Crop Tractor16
TW-25 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 27th · 1,200 models
TW-25 (A)210 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | TW-25 | 210 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Toyosha | — |
| Model | Ford | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 156hp | 25hp | ▲ TW-25+131 hp · +524% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 210+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 2 | ▲ TW-25+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 401ci | 77.1ci | ▲ TW-25+324 ci · +420% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.6in | ▲ TW-25+0.8 in · +22% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 3.7in | ▲ TW-25+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 83.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 115in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 11,500lb | 2,325lb | ▲ TW-25+9,175 lb · +395% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | 540 (1.375) | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II/III | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 7,150lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.5gal | 1.3gal | ▲ TW-25+4.2 gal · +323% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford TW-25 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station with ROPS or Cab (optional) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 60th percentile (156 hp)B · 2nd percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 51st percentile (401 ci)B · 1st percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 44th percentile (11,500 lb)B · 1st percentile (2,325 lb)
A · TW-25B · 210Median Row Crop Tractor